ADVERTORIAL
Stonebridge DailyUnited States flagReader's Desk
Wellness › Everyday Hearing37 min read

Three Quarter Cups of Water a Day, and Five Herbs in Each

TinnaRex is taken as half a milliliter stirred into a quarter cup of water, morning, midday and evening. I walked through one ordinary day of it, glass by glass, and set each glass beside what has been measured.

A man in his sixties at a slate kitchen counter pouring a quarter cup of water into a small glass beside an amber bottle, a stone bridge outside the window

Walter Brix is the pen name of this desk, which writes for the seller's advertising.

Everything here about the bottle comes from the seller's product page, its published terms and the customer reviews on that page, all read in September 2026.

The reviewers quoted further down are real and their words are public on the seller's site.

The small pictures beside three of them are illustrations, not the reviewers.

This page is about TinnaRex, five herbs in vegetable glycerin and water from Native Remedies in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Its directions ask for half a milliliter in a quarter cup of water, three times a day, and that small glass is where this page starts.

There is a small glass in most kitchens that nobody thinks about.

It is the one you use for orange juice, or for water with a vitamin, and it holds a little more than half a cup.

This bottle is built around that glass.

Not around a spoon, or a capsule, or a spray, but around a quarter cup of water and the short walk to the sink three times a day.

I have read a great many labels on this desk, and most of them tell you what is inside and stop there.

This one tells you what to do with your hands, and I think that is the most honest place to start.

Half a milliliter, a quarter cup, three times a day.

Those ten words are the whole routine.

Everything else on the listing is a description of the bottle, and everything else on this page is a description of what those ten words ask of you.

The routine is aimed at something specific.

It is aimed at a thin, steady sound that some men hear when a room goes quiet, the one nobody else at the table can hear.

You know the moment if you have it.

The dishwasher finishes, the television goes off, the traffic outside thins out, and there it is, as if it had been waiting for the room to empty.

This page does not promise that a glass of anything will change that sound.

The seller does not promise it either, if you read the label rather than the sales copy, and I will show you where the difference sits.

What I can do is walk through the day the bottle asks for.

Three glasses, in order, and what is actually known about each thing that goes into them.

A Quarter Cup Is Four Tablespoons, and the Bottle Would Nearly Fit In It

Start with the measure, because the measure is the part of this bottle nobody writes about.

A quarter cup is four tablespoons of water.

In the metric the label also uses, it is a little over 59 milliliters.

The bottle holds 60 milliliters.

Which means the glass you mix each dose into is, give or take a teaspoon, the same size as the entire bottle.

The whole bottle would nearly fit in one of the glasses.

I mention that not as a curiosity but because it tells you how small the dose is.

Half a milliliter in a quarter cup is one part in about a hundred and twenty.

You will not taste much of it.

You will not see much of it either, beyond a faint gold thread that disappears the moment you stir.

A man's hands filling a steel quarter-cup measure with water and tipping it into a small clear glass on a slate counter

Now turn the arithmetic around.

Sixty milliliters, half a milliliter at a time, is a hundred and twenty doses.

A hundred and twenty doses is a hundred and twenty small glasses.

At three a day, that is forty days from the first glass to the last.

One bottle is a hundred and twenty small glasses, and forty days at the adult directions.

The listing says something different, and you should know it before you plan around it.

It says a bottle lasts approximately eighty days.

Eighty days at half a milliliter three times a day would need a bottle twice this size.

I cannot make the listing's number agree with the listing's own directions, and I am not going to invent a reason for it.

There is one reading that fits, and it is worth giving.

The top of the page says the product suits adults and children six and over, and a smaller dose for a small child would stretch a bottle toward eighty days.

The directions tab, though, only gives a dose for ages ten and over.

So the page describes two different people and prints one length of bottle, and the length it prints is not the one for you.

Plan on forty days. If the bottle lasts longer, it will be because some glasses were skipped, and the second glass is the one that usually goes.

One more number while the measuring cup is out.

A hundred and twenty quarter cups is thirty cups of water, a little under two gallons, poured one small glass at a time.

Nobody drinks two gallons of anything in forty days and notices it.

But it is worth seeing the routine at its true size, because a routine is what you are buying, as much as a bottle.

The First Glass: What Goes Into the Water

The first glass is the one most people remember, because it comes with breakfast and breakfast is a habit already.

So this is the glass where I read the label.

Split view of a small glass of water on a windowsill at dawn and on a lamp-lit nightstand at night
The first glass and the third: the whole routine happens between these two.

There are five herbs in the bottle, listed in this order on the ingredients tab.

St. John's wort, ginkgo, rosemary, oatstraw, and a vervain the listing calls European blue vervain.

They are carried in vegetable glycerin and deionized water.

There is no alcohol in the base, which is less common among herb bottles than you might expect.

Five plants, a sweet syrup, and water. That is the whole of what goes into the glass.

Glycerin is a thick, clear, faintly sweet liquid.

It is why the extract pours slowly and why the gold thread in the glass looks like honey before it dissolves.

Many herb bottles use alcohol to draw the plant into the liquid.

This one uses glycerin, and for a man who counts what he drinks in an evening, that is one fewer thing on the tally.

The listing adds that the product contains no gluten and no lactose, and that it suits vegetarians.

Those are statements about what is not in the bottle, and they are the kind a man can hold a seller to.

Then comes the line on the ingredients tab that I read three times.

After the five herbs, the listing says they are present "in therapeutic dosage".

It does not say what that dosage is.

Not for St. John's wort, not for ginkgo, not for any of the five.

There is no supplement facts panel on the listing, no milligrams, no percentages, and no split between the five herbs.

The only measured thing anywhere on the page is the half milliliter.

That measures the liquid, not the plants, and half a milliliter of a five-herb glycerin extract could carry very different amounts of each.

I do not read "in therapeutic dosage" as a lie.

I read it as an old convention of herbal manufacture, one that asserts the amounts are right without giving you a way to check.

The consequence is practical, and it follows you through the whole day.

When a trial tested one of these herbs at a weighed amount, you cannot hold this bottle up against it, because there is nothing on the bottle to hold up.

Keep that in mind as the day goes on.

It is the single fact that decides how much any trial on this page can say about your glass.

Half a Milliliter Is About a Tenth of a Teaspoon

The cap has a glass measuring tube with a rubber bulb on top, and the tube is how you get to half a milliliter.

It is a small amount and it is easy to get wrong in either direction.

A kitchen teaspoon holds about five milliliters.

Half a milliliter is a tenth of that, which is less than most people guess the first time they squeeze.

A tenth of a teaspoon, three times a day, is the entire dose.

Glycerin makes the measuring harder than it would be with water.

It clings to the inside of the glass tube and drains slowly, so the first squeeze often leaves a little behind.

If the tube is marked, read the mark at eye level with the bottle on the counter, not held up to a window.

If it is not marked, the honest answer is that nobody at home measures half a milliliter precisely, and that is one more reason the dose on this bottle is an approximation.

The listing says to dilute the drops in a small amount of water, juice or milk.

Water is the plain choice and the one I would use, because juice and milk both have tastes of their own that make it harder to notice anything about the glass.

Stir once and drink it.

There is no instruction about food, so breakfast, lunch and dinner are the obvious anchors, and anchors are what keep a three-a-day routine going.

A ribbon of golden glycerin extract curling slowly through a small glass of water

One practical note about children, since the listing raises them.

The header says adults and children six and over, the directions give a dose only for ten and over, and neither says what to do between six and ten.

This page is written for men over fifty-five, so I will leave that where it is.

But it is one more place where the top of the listing and the directions tab do not quite meet.

St. John's Wort Is First on the Label, and in Every Glass

Labels list ingredients in a deliberate order, and on this one St. John's wort comes first.

So before any other herb, it is worth knowing what this one is.

It is the yellow-flowered plant of roadsides and dry meadows, in bloom around the longest days of June.

It has been gathered for centuries, and in this bottle it is listed as wild-crafted flowering herb, meaning picked where it grew rather than farmed.

The seller lists it for the nervous system, in the traditional language of herbal practice.

No trial I can find has tested it on hearing or on a ringing, and the seller cites none.

So for the ears it brings nothing measured.

What it brings, and the reason it matters in every one of your glasses, is its interaction list.

The federal agency for complementary health states that St. John's wort can interact in dangerous, sometimes life-threatening ways with a variety of everyday medicines, weakening some and strengthening others. [1]

It is one of the most interaction-prone plants sold on any shelf.

The same agency says that in large amounts it may cause severe skin reactions after time in the sun. [1]

That is why the label on this bottle tells you, in its own words, to avoid excessive exposure to sunlight or UV light while taking it.

First on the label, and first in line for a word with the pharmacist.

I would not skip past this because the amount in half a milliliter is probably small.

The label does not print the amount, so neither you nor I can say how small, and the label's own caution is written as if it matters.

I will come back to the caution in full when the day reaches it.

For now, hold on to the name, because it is one of two names you will want to say out loud at a pharmacy counter before the first glass.

The Second Glass, at Midday, Is the One That Gets Missed

Now the middle of the day, and the glass that decides whether a three-a-day routine is really three a day.

Breakfast is easy, because you are already at the counter.

Evening is easy, because the kitchen is where the day ends.

Midday is where a routine leaks.

You are out, or busy, or eating somewhere other than your own kitchen, and the small bottle is at home on the windowsill.

I say this without judgment, because every routine I have ever kept has had a middle that slipped.

But it changes the arithmetic of the bottle, and it changes what you can learn from it.

A man who misses the midday glass most days is taking two glasses, not three.

His bottle lasts sixty days instead of forty, and his routine is a third lighter than the one on the label.

If the midday glass goes, the bottle lasts longer and the routine is not the one the directions describe.

There are two honest ways around it, and neither costs anything.

Move the second glass to the moment you come home in the afternoon, or pour it at lunch wherever lunch is, from a small bottle you can carry.

The listing does not say the three glasses must be evenly spaced.

It says three times a day, and the plain reading is that three is the number that matters, not the clock.

The listing has two sentences about regularity, and they belong to the midday glass more than to any other.

It says to get the best results with regular use, and that people differ widely in how long they take to respond.

Some, it says, may notice a general feeling of wellness within days, and for others it may take longer.

Read that slowly, because it is a careful sentence and it is doing a specific job.

A statement that a result may take any length of time is a statement that can never be disappointed.

It leaves no day on the calendar when the bottle is supposed to have done something, and that is exactly why you should choose one yourself.

Regular use, in plain terms, means the midday glass.

If the result is supposed to depend on regularity, then a routine that quietly drops to two glasses is not the routine the listing is describing, and it is not a fair test of it either.

If regular use is the condition, the second glass is the test of it.

The midday glass is also where I read the herb this bottle is best known for.

It is fitting, because the trial that tested that herb asked its volunteers for exactly the same thing: three doses a day, every day.

Ginkgo, and a Trial That Also Asked for Three Doses a Day

Of the five herbs, the seller singles out ginkgo for hearing.

The listing says ginkgo has been researched for its ability to support healthy hearing.

That sentence is true, and I want to give it credit before anything else.

It is more than most listings can say about any plant they print.

Golden fan-shaped ginkgo leaves on a slate counter beside a small glass of water and folded reading glasses

Ginkgo is the fan-leaved tree that lines streets in half the towns in this country.

Its leaf extract has been sold for the ears and for memory for about forty years, long enough for somebody to test it properly.

Somebody did.

In 2001 the British Medical Journal published the largest trial of it there has ever been for a ringing, and it is worth reading slowly. [2]

It enrolled 1,121 adults aged 18 to 70 who heard a steady ringing, and half of them took 50 milligrams of a standardized ginkgo extract three times a day for twelve weeks while the other half took a placebo. [2]

At the end, 34 of the 360 people on ginkgo said the sound troubled them less, and 35 of the 360 on placebo said exactly the same. [2]

Read those last two numbers again.

Thirty-four on the herb, thirty-five on the placebo.

Three doses a day, twelve weeks, more than a thousand people, and a tie.

That is not a near miss that fell the wrong way.

It is a herb and a placebo doing the same thing in a very large group, and the authors wrote it down in one flat sentence: no more effective than placebo. [2]

Look at what those volunteers did every day, because it will be familiar.

They took a measured dose three times a day, morning, midday and evening, for twelve weeks.

In other words they did what this bottle asks of you, for more than twice as long as one bottle lasts.

And at the end of it, the herb and the placebo came out level.

One trial is one trial, so I went looking for the rest.

A Cochrane review pooled four trials with 1,543 participants between them and found no evidence that ginkgo helps when a ringing is the main complaint. [3]

Cochrane reviews are the plain, careful end of the evidence business.

They do not run studies; they gather the ones that exist, weigh how well each was done, and report what is left.

The federal agency for complementary health says the same thing on its public ginkgo page, in a single sentence.

Its page says ginkgo is not helpful for relieving a ringing in the ears. [4]

A trial of 1,121 people, a pooled review of 1,543, and a federal fact sheet all point the same way: ginkgo did no better than placebo for a ringing.

Fan-shaped ginkgo leaves moving in a breeze over the stone parapet of an old bridge, a river blurred below

What the Trial Weighed That This Label Does Not

There is one fair defense of the bottle here, and it cuts both ways.

The trial used a measured, standardized extract at 150 milligrams a day, and this bottle prints no amount of ginkgo at all.

Standardized means the maker states how much of certain compounds each batch contains, so that one bottle is the same object as the next.

The trial used a standardized extract; this listing does not use the word for any of the five herbs. [2]

So you can read the trial two ways.

You can say it tested a different preparation, so it does not apply to this glass.

Or you can read it the way I do.

The version with a number behind it was tested and did nothing, and the version with no number behind it has never been tested at all.

Neither reading gives you a reason to buy. One says the evidence is against it; the other says there is none.

This is the price of "in therapeutic dosage".

A label without numbers cannot be held against a trial in either direction, so it can never be shown to work and never be shown not to.

I do not say that to be unkind to a small Wisconsin company.

I say it because it is the most useful sentence on this page if you are deciding whether forty days of glasses are worth your attention.

Rosemary, Oatstraw, and the Vervain With Two Names

Three herbs remain, and they share one fact before anything else.

None of them has a trial on hearing, and the seller does not claim one.

Rosemary is the one you already own.

It is the kitchen herb that goes on a roast, and the seller calls it a circulation tonic.

Rosemary, green oat stalks, violet vervain and yellow St. John's wort laid in a row on linen on a slate counter

The only trial I can put in front of you gave 28 adults averaging 75 years old a single dose of dried rosemary leaf, close to a kitchen amount, and timed how quickly they remembered things. [5]

A much larger dose sent the same measure the other way, which is worth knowing about any plant. [5]

That trial measured memory, not hearing, and it used a weighed dose on a single day.

This bottle prints no weight for its rosemary, so even that thin thread does not reach your glass.

Oatstraw is the fourth herb.

It is the green stalk and leaf of the common oat, cut before the grain ripens, and it is a different thing from the oatmeal in your cupboard.

The oat trials that exist used a concentrated extract of the green plant in measured amounts, not a glycerin extract of the straw.

One found something on thinking tasks in adults aged 35 to 65, [6] and another found nothing at all in adults around 67. [7]

Neither looked at the ears.

Neither used this preparation, and neither used an amount this label prints, because this label prints none.

The fifth herb deserves a paragraph of its own, for a reason that has nothing to do with what it does.

The listing calls it "European Blue Vervain", and that name describes two different plants.

Blue vervain is Verbena hastata, a North American plant with tall spikes of small violet-blue flowers.

European vervain is Verbena officinalis, a separate species native to Europe, with slender spikes of pale mauve flowers.

The listing's name is the American plant with a European adjective in front of it.

A careful reader cannot tell which species is in his glass, and there is no panel on the page to settle it.

Both plants have long histories as bitter herbs in folk practice, and neither has a trial on hearing.

So the confusion does not change the evidence; it tells you how closely the listing was read before it was published.

There is one more small sign of the same kind.

The ingredients tab spells ginkgo as "gingko", which is a common slip and tells you the same thing the vervain does.

Four of the five herbs have no trial on hearing, the fifth has a large trial that came out even, and not one of them has a weight on the label.

The Line of Caution That Goes Into Every Glass

Every glass of the day carries the same caution, so I have put it in the middle of the day, where it belongs.

The label prints it in plain words, and it is more specific than most.

Do not use this product together with warfarin or other anticoagulants.

And while taking St. John's wort, avoid excessive exposure to sunlight or UV light.

Two of the five herbs stand behind those two lines.

Ginkgo is behind the first: the federal agency for complementary health says ginkgo may raise the chance of bleeding in people taking anything that thins the blood. [4]

St. John's wort is behind both, and it is the more serious of the two.

Its interaction list runs across a wide range of everyday medicines, and the agency calls some of those interactions dangerous. [1]

Two names to say out loud: St. John's wort, and ginkgo.

I am not going to print the list of what it interacts with here.

It is long, it is summarized in the ingredient guide linked at the foot of this page, and a pharmacist can read it against your actual bag in a few minutes.

So here is the whole of my advice on this part, and it costs nothing.

Put everything you take every day into one bag, this bottle included, and carry the bag to a pharmacy counter before the first glass.

Then say the two names out loud.

They are exactly the words that make the person behind the counter stop and check.

A man's hands placing a small amber bottle and two plain boxes into a brown paper bag on a kitchen table and folding it shut

None of this makes the bottle a dangerous object.

It makes it a real plant extract with real interactions, which is what you should be told before you pay rather than after.

And it is worth noticing where the caution lives.

It is on the label, which is the document the seller's legal department stands behind, not in the sales copy.

The sales copy on the same product page describes the product as entirely without unwanted effects.

I am paraphrasing on purpose, because I do not repeat that sort of sentence even to quote it.

When a page says a product has no unwanted effects and then prints a caution about anticoagulants and sunlight, believe the caution.

The Third Glass, Just Before the House Goes Quiet

The third glass comes at the end of the day, after dinner, when the kitchen is cleared.

It is the glass drunk closest to the moment this bottle is really about.

That moment is the quiet room.

The house settles, the last appliance clicks off, and for some men a thin, high sound arrives that was there all day under everything else.

A man in his sixties in a lamp-lit armchair switching off the television and sitting quietly as the room goes still

If you do not hear it, this section will sound strange, and that is fine.

If you do, you already know that nobody else in the room can hear it, and that it is loudest when there is nothing else to hear.

It is common, and far more common than the conversation around it suggests.

In the largest national survey there is, about one adult in ten in this country reported hearing it at some point in the past year. [8]

The same survey asked how long, and how often.

About a quarter of those people had heard it for more than fifteen years, and more than a third heard it nearly all the time. [8]

Most of the men who hear it have heard it for years, and most of them manage.

The survey asked how much it bothered them, too, and the answer is worth having.

About four in ten called it a small problem, and only about seven in a hundred called it a big one. [8]

Then comes the number I think matters most on this whole page.

Only about half of the people who heard it had ever talked about it with a clinician. [8]

And hearing aids had come up with fewer than one in ten of them. [8]

So a great many men live with this sound for years without anyone ever having looked at their ears, or tested how well they hear.

Half the people who hear a ringing have never mentioned it to anyone who could check. That is a bigger gap than any bottle could fill.

That is the room this bottle is sold into.

It is a room full of men who would rather drink a small glass three times a day than make an appointment, and I understand the instinct.

But the third glass is a good moment to be honest about it.

The appointment can find things the glass cannot, and the next section is about what the people who do the finding put in writing.

Three glasses, then, from breakfast to the quiet of the evening.

This is the bottle all three of them come out of, and the one gesture it asks of your hands each time.

A man's hands drawing a measured amount from an amber bottle with the glass tube in its cap and squeezing it into a small glass of water

What the Ear Specialists Put in Writing

In 2014 the American academy of ear, nose and throat specialists published a clinical practice guideline on a persistent, bothersome ringing.

It is the specialists' own professional body, writing for its own members. [9]

The guideline estimates that 10 to 15 percent of adults hear a ringing, and that more than 50 million people in the United States have reported it. [9]

That is a very large number of people and, as you will see, a very short list of things that help.

On supplements, it is direct.

It recommends against ginkgo, melatonin, zinc and other dietary supplements for that ringing. [9]

Not a gap in the evidence. A recommendation, written out, in the negative.

I am writing on behalf of the seller, and I am telling you the specialists' guideline recommends against the category this bottle belongs to.

You should weigh that at least as heavily as anything else on this page.

The rest of the guideline is the useful part, and it is short.

It asks for a prompt, thorough hearing examination when the ringing is in one ear only, when it has lasted six months or more, or when it comes with difficulty hearing. [9]

It recommends a hearing-aid evaluation when the test finds the hearing has faded. [9]

And it recommends sound therapy, plus a form of talking therapy aimed at how much the sound bothers you, which is the part that can actually change. [9]

A blank appointment card and a pencil beside an old telephone on a hallway table in afternoon light

A proper hearing examination is done one ear at a time, in a quiet booth, with calibrated equipment.

It is read together with a look inside the ear canal, and it is the one step on this page that can find something that gets dealt with in a single visit.

The people who do it are audiologists and ear, nose and throat clinicians.

You do not need to say the word ringing to book one; "I would like my hearing checked" is enough.

Every recommendation in the guideline is an appointment, a device or a habit. None of them is a glass of anything.

What Changes the Quiet Room Without a Glass

The third glass leads straight to the quiet room, so this is where the cheap, known things belong.

None of them is sold by anybody, and all of them come before any bottle.

The first is the quiet itself.

A sound that arrives only when the house is silent is a sound competing with nothing, and the guideline's sound therapy starts from exactly that. [9]

A radio left low, a small fan on the nightstand, a window open to the sound of water or traffic.

It costs nothing, thousands of men already do it without calling it anything, and it is the one item here you can act on tonight.

A man's hand turning on a small wooden radio at low volume on a lamp-lit nightstand beside a glass of water

The second is noise, and it is about the ears you will have in ten years rather than tonight.

In the national survey, a ringing was about three times as common in people with steady loud noise at work, and more common with loud leisure noise too. [8]

A mower, a table saw, a motorcycle, headphones at their loudest.

Earplugs and distance are the whole of the protection, and a pair of foam earplugs in the workshop drawer costs less than one small glass of this bottle.

The third is a question about coffee, because somebody always asks it.

The largest long-term study of caffeine and a ringing followed 65,085 women for eighteen years, and those who drank the most caffeine were somewhat less likely to develop it, not more. [10]

That study was in women aged 30 to 44 and it is observational, so it cannot tell you what your own cup is doing.

What it can tell you is that the case against your morning coffee is thinner than the people telling you to quit it suggest.

The fourth is the other thing people buy for their ears, because it sits on the same shelf.

A Cochrane review of three trials with 209 adults found no evidence that zinc supplements improve a ringing either. [11]

This bottle contains no zinc, so I include it for one reason only.

It shows you what a tested-and-found-wanting result looks like, so you recognize the shape of one when a listing does not print it.

A radio at night, earplugs when it is loud, no reason to give up coffee, and a hearing examination. Four things ahead of any bottle, and three of them cost nothing.

There is a reason I put these before the bottle, and it is not only cost.

If one of them is your answer, the bottle will look as though it worked, and you will keep paying for that coincidence.

Split view of one kitchen busy in the evening and silent late at night
The same room, busy in the evening and still at night, which is when the sound arrives.

Sixteen Reviews, and the Four About the Glass

The seller's page carries sixteen customer reviews with an average of 4.1 stars.

An average hides the shape, so here is the shape: nine at five stars, three at four, two at three, and two at one.

I read all sixteen across both pages of the review widget, and most of them I could not print.

You are owed the reason, because which reviews a page shows you is most of what a page is.

Several name the condition, which this page does not print, and several say the bottle stopped the sound completely.

That second claim is one the trial in the middle of this page does not support, and I will not relay it.

Two more say nothing about the bottle, one because the writer had not opened it and one because it praised the store.

That leaves four, and I have kept all four, including a single star, on purpose.

Three carry the seller's mark of a confirmed purchase and one does not.

Dorothy R's review names the condition in its first sentence; her second sentence is quoted exactly as she wrote it, and the others are quoted whole, slips and all.

Illustrative portrait, not the reviewer
Raphael B Confirmed Buyer
★★★★☆
seemed to mute the noise, somewhat
Illustrative portrait, not the reviewer
Dorothy R Confirmed Buyer
★★★★☆
I can tell the difference if I miss taking it for a few days.
Illustrative portrait, not the reviewer
Irene R Confirmed Buyer
★★★★☆
Easy to use, mu dad is happy
Lb Verified source
★☆☆☆☆
Have used half a bottle and still have buzzing in my ears. No change in level.

Read them the way I did, one at a time.

Raphael's "somewhat" is the most careful word on the seller's entire page, and he gave the bottle four stars while writing it.

Dorothy's sentence is about missed glasses, which makes it the review most about the routine itself.

Noticing a difference when you skip a few days is a real experience, and it is also what any daily habit feels like when it stops.

Irene wrote "easy to use", which is the only review in the pile about the glass rather than the result.

She bought it for her father, and her review says more about the routine than about the herbs.

The single star used half a bottle, which at the directions on the label is about sixty small glasses, and heard no change.

That is what the 1,121-person trial would have predicted, and he is the only reviewer who told me what nothing feels like. [2]

Nobody I kept describes a clear result. One describes something modest, one describes a habit, one describes ease, and one describes nothing.

One word about the 4.1, since it is the number the page leads with.

An average of sixteen opinions measures how sixteen people felt about a purchase, which is real, and different from whether five herbs did anything.

What the Front of the Bottle Is Allowed to Promise

Turn the bottle around to the front, because the front is a different document from the back.

The front calls it an herbal supplement for healthy ears and clear, undisturbed hearing.*

That line carries an asterisk, and the asterisk carries the standard sentence that the Food and Drug Administration has not evaluated it.

That is not a loophole and it is not a scandal.

It is the rule every supplement in this country is sold under, and the asterisk is where the rule shows.

A supplement may say it supports a normal function of the body.

It may not say it acts on a named condition, and the space between those two sentences is where this entire shelf lives.

A statement of terrain, not a statement of result.

So read the front panel for what it is.

"Healthy ears and clear hearing" names the part of the body the bottle is about; it does not say anything will get quieter.

I give the maker credit for keeping the label on the right side of that line.

Where the line gets crossed is not on the bottle; it is in the warmer sales copy two tabs away, and I have already told you which document to believe.

The other bullets on the listing run in the same register.

Support for the structures of the ear, for sound conduction, for the nervous system, for circulation: every one is a support claim, and none can be measured from your armchair.

The Delivery Schedule Runs Faster Than the Bottle

Now the money, measured the only way that makes sense for this bottle: by the glass.

On the day I read the listing, one bottle cost $39.95.

A hundred and twenty glasses to the bottle puts each small glass at about thirty-three cents, and each day at about a dollar.

Thirty-three cents a glass, a dollar a day, and forty days a bottle.

The seller sets the price, and prices move, so look at it yourself before you click anything.

Look at the shipping line for your own address too; the economy rate in the United States was $7.95 when I read it.

The listing also offers a subscription, and this is where the glass and the calendar stop agreeing.

Subscribe and Save takes 15 percent off, to $33.96, charges no shipping on each delivery, and sends a bottle every four weeks by default.

Four weeks is twenty-eight days.

A bottle, at three glasses a day, is forty.

So the default delivery runs twelve days ahead of the bottle every cycle.

After about nine months you would have received ten bottles and emptied seven, with three unopened on the shelf.

The default subscription sends a bottle every 28 days; the bottle lasts 40. Change the interval, or buy one bottle at a time.

That is not a trap, and the seller lets you set the interval.

It is simply the default, and defaults are what most people keep.

Then there is the return window, and it is the best thing on the listing.

The seller gives you one full year: try the product for at least thirty days, and if you are not satisfied, send it back within a year for a refund of the price, less shipping.

The terms ask you to return every container, opened and unopened, with your name and order number.

They also ask for a return authorization before you post it, and the postage back is yours.

A year is nine bottles long, and that is generous by any standard I know.

But it guards the forty dollars, not the forty days of glasses, and the only way to get value from it is to decide on a fixed date.

So here is where the day ends and the decision starts.

The bottle is sold by one company, and that is the only place this page sends you.

One bottle, and the forty days of glasses it holds

TinnaRex · 60 mL

Five herbs in a small bottle of vegetable glycerin and water, half a milliliter in a quarter cup of water three times a day, from a Wisconsin company with a one-year return window.

SEE THE BOTTLE AND ITS DIRECTIONS

Sold by Silver Star Brands, Inc. (Native Remedies), Oshkosh, Wisconsin · 60 mL · half a milliliter in a quarter cup of water three times a day · about forty days a bottle · a full year to send it back after at least thirty days of use, refund of the price less shipping

The company publishes a street address, a telephone number and an email address, all on its own pages.

Those are facts about who you would be dealing with, not claims about herbs, and I keep the two apart on purpose.

I have read listings this year with no street address anywhere and no telephone number at all.

A company that prints both and then gives you a year is not the weak point of this page; the evidence for the herbs is.

How I Would Run Forty Days of Glasses

If you decide to try it, try it the way you would test anything else: with a start, an end, and something written down.

  • Book the hearing examination first. It comes before the first glass, and it can find something the glass cannot.
  • Take the bottle and everything else you take daily to a pharmacy counter, and say the two names: St. John's wort, and ginkgo.
  • Buy one bottle, not a subscription on the default interval. One bottle is the whole test.
  • Pick the three moments of the day before the first glass, and make the second one a moment you are always home.
  • Measure half a milliliter at eye level, stir it into a quarter cup of water, and drink it.
  • Write one line each evening, after the third glass: what the quiet room sounded like, and what you had been doing that day.
  • Change nothing else in the same forty days. One change at a time, or the notebook tells you nothing.
  • On the last glass, read your forty lines beside the ten you wrote in the week before you started.
A man's hands writing a line in a small notebook beside three empty glasses and an amber bottle on a slate counter

The evening line is the one that matters, so here is what I mean by it.

Not "better" or "worse", which are words memory rewrites, but the plain facts of the quiet room at the same hour.

Was the sound there when the television went off, or only later, when the house was fully still?

Was it the same pitch as last night, and was the radio on?

Then one line about the day itself.

A loud afternoon with a mower, a long drive, a late coffee, a poor night before: the things that change an evening whether or not there is a glass in it.

After ten days you will start to see a pattern in the day lines that has nothing to do with the bottle.

That pattern is often the most useful thing the notebook gives you, and it is yours whatever you decide about the glasses.

Look at that list the way I do.

Seven of its eight lines cost nothing, and the eighth is a notebook.

The notebook is the line men skip, and it is the line that decides whether you learn anything.

Forty entries written at the same hour will tell you more about your own evenings than this page can.

The week before is the part almost nobody does.

Without it you have nothing to compare the forty days against, and memory is a poor judge of how loud last month was.

Forty days, a hundred and twenty glasses, fifty lines in a notebook, and one decision on a date you chose in advance.

Who the Three Glasses Suit, and Who Should Skip Them

This is worth a look if:

A small glass of water on a sunlit windowsill beside an amber bottle, a hand picking it up at midday as the curtain stirs
  • You would rather have five plants you can name in a glycerin base than a long blend of things you cannot.
  • You have read the trial in the middle of this page and are deciding with your eyes open.
  • You have already booked the hearing examination, or had one recently.
  • You will carry the bottle to a pharmacy counter and name the two herbs before the first glass.
  • You are home at midday, or can move the second glass to a moment when you always are.
  • You will buy one bottle and decide on day forty, not drift into a delivery every four weeks.

Give it a miss if:

  • You take anything that thins the blood. The label itself says not to, and that settles it.
  • You spend long days in strong sun and would rather not change that for a bottle.
  • You wanted an amount printed beside each herb. There is none, for any of the five.
  • You wanted the main herb's trial on your side. It ran in 1,121 people and came out even. [2]
  • You have not yet had your hearing examined. That appointment comes first.

The Day, Glass by Glass, in Short

Three small glasses of water in a row on a slate windowsill beside an amber bottle, a stone bridge blurred outside
  • A 60-milliliter amber bottle of five herbs in vegetable glycerin and water, sold by Silver Star Brands, Inc. of Oshkosh, Wisconsin as an herbal supplement.
  • The routine is half a milliliter, about a tenth of a teaspoon, in a quarter cup of water, three times a day.
  • A quarter cup is nearly the volume of the whole bottle; one bottle is a hundred and twenty small glasses and about forty days, not the eighty the listing prints.
  • The first glass carries St. John's wort, first on the label, with a long interaction list and a sun caution printed by the label itself. [1]
  • The second glass carries ginkgo, tested three times a day for twelve weeks in 1,121 people: 34 of 360 on the herb and 35 of 360 on placebo. [2]
  • A Cochrane review of four trials found the same, [3] and so does the federal fact sheet. [4]
  • Rosemary, oatstraw and vervain have no trial on hearing; the listing's vervain name fits two species.
  • No amount is printed for any of the five herbs, and "standardized" appears nowhere.
  • Only about half the people who hear a ringing have ever talked to a clinician about it. [8]
  • The specialists' guideline recommends a hearing examination, a hearing-aid evaluation where the test calls for it, and sound therapy, and recommends against supplements. [9]
  • A radio at night, earplugs when it is loud, and no reason to give up coffee. [8] [10]
  • About thirty-three cents a glass; the default subscription runs twelve days ahead of the bottle; the return window is a full year.
  • Sixteen reviews averaging 4.1 stars, four quoted here, including a single star.

Questions about the three glasses

Will the glasses make the sound quieter?

Nobody can honestly promise that, and I will not. The largest trial of its main herb came out even in 1,121 people. [2]

How much is half a milliliter?

About a tenth of a teaspoon. The glass measuring tube in the cap is how you draw it.

Can I skip the water and take it straight?

The directions say to dilute it in water, juice or milk. I would follow them.

What if I miss the midday glass?

Move it to a time you are always home. Two glasses a day is a different routine from the one on the label.

How long does one bottle last?

About forty days at three glasses a day. The listing's "approximately 80 days" does not match its own directions.

Should I ask anyone before the first glass?

Yes, a pharmacist, with everything you take daily in one bag. The label says not to combine it with anything that thins the blood. [1]

Is my coffee making the sound worse?

The largest long-term study pointed the other way, in 65,085 women over eighteen years. [10]

What should come before any bottle?

A hearing examination, one ear at a time. It is the step the specialists' guideline asks for. [9]

What One Ordinary Day of This Is Worth

Here is the whole of it, in one breath.

This is a plainly made herbal extract from a company that prints its address, answers a telephone, and gives you a year to change your mind.

It is also a bottle whose best-known herb was tested for exactly this, three times a day, in more than a thousand people, and came out level with a placebo.

Both of those sentences are true at once.

Most pages you will read about this bottle print only one of them.

A decent company and a thin case are not a contradiction. They are two facts, side by side.

The glass itself is a small thing to ask of a day.

A quarter cup of water, a tenth of a teaspoon of amber syrup, three times between breakfast and bed.

What the glass cannot do is replace the other three things on this page: the pharmacy counter, the radio at night, and the hearing examination.

If you have done those three, forty days of glasses is a small, dated question you can ask for about forty dollars and answer with a notebook.

If you have not done them, do them first.

They cost less than the bottle, and one of them can find something that a glass of water never will.

Book the hearing examination, name the two herbs at the pharmacy counter, buy one bottle, pour three glasses a day, write one line each evening, and decide on day forty.

An old stone arch bridge over a slow river at dusk, a lit window in a stone house beyond

Each of the five herbs, with its plain English name, what the label does and does not print about it, and whatever research exists for it, is written out in the ingredient guide linked at the foot of this page.

That guide also carries the interaction cautions in full, the references, and the disclosures this page is required to make.

The amber bottle and the three glasses it asks for

TinnaRex · 60 mL

Five herbs in a small bottle of vegetable glycerin and water, half a milliliter in a quarter cup of water three times a day, from a Wisconsin company with a one-year return window.

SEE THE BOTTLE AND ITS DIRECTIONS

Native Remedies, a brand of Silver Star Brands, Inc. · five herbs in vegetable glycerin and deionized water · a hundred and twenty small glasses to a bottle · one year to send it back, after at least thirty days of use

SEE THE BOTTLE AND ITS DIRECTIONS

Sold and shipped by Silver Star Brands, Inc., Oshkosh, Wisconsin. The price is set by the seller.

P.S. If you keep one number from this page, keep the one from the second glass.

Thirty-four on the herb, thirty-five on the placebo, three doses a day for twelve weeks. [2]

P.P.S. If the sound is in one ear only, if it arrived suddenly, or if it comes with difficulty hearing, that is an appointment this week rather than a purchase.

A glass of water with herbs in it was never going to answer a question that a hearing examination answers in half an hour.

References (11)
  1. NIH NCCIH. "St. John's Wort" nccih.nih.gov
  2. Drew S., Davies E. (2001). BMJ 322(7278):73 doi.org
  3. Hilton M.P., Zimmermann E.F., Hunt W.T. (2013). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013(3):CD003852 doi.org
  4. NIH NCCIH. "Ginkgo" nccih.nih.gov
  5. Pengelly A. et al. (2012). Journal of Medicinal Food 15(1):10-17 doi.org
  6. Kennedy D.O. et al. (2020). Nutrients 12(6):1598 doi.org
  7. Wong R.H. et al. (2012). Nutrients 4(5):331-342 doi.org
  8. Bhatt J.M., Lin H.W., Bhattacharyya N. (2016). JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 142(10):959-965 doi.org
  9. Tunkel D.E. et al. (2014). Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 151(2 Suppl):S1-S40 doi.org
  10. Glicksman J.T., Curhan S.G., Curhan G.C. (2014). American Journal of Medicine 127(8):739-743 doi.org
  11. Person O.C., Puga M.E., da Silva E.M., Torloni M.R. (2016). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016(11):CD009832 doi.org